Doctor and patient care team reviewing an international patient access pathway in Kuala Lumpur
Applications are reviewed separately from clinical suitability. Support remains subject to programme criteria and available funds.

SCCM Patient Access Fund

Your Care Creates Care.

An SCCM-funded commitment directing 2% of qualifying treatment revenue toward carefully governed patient-access support.

No compulsory additional patient charge. Clinical suitability and financial support remain separate decisions.

The Model

A transparent allocation, funded by SCCM.

For each qualifying treatment, SCCM allocates an amount equal to 2% of treatment revenue to a separately governed patient-access programme.

Qualifying revenue x 2% = SCCM allocation

This is not a patient donation or surcharge. The calculation and reconciliation remain in SCCM internal finance and governance workflow.

Internal Allocation

Patient surchargeRM0
SCCM allocation2%
ReconciliationInternal

Patients apply for assistance based on need. They are not asked to calculate or manage the allocation.

Request Assistance

A dignified first step, with only the information we need.

This initial application helps the access team understand the patient, the care need and the main barrier. Detailed medical or financial documents are requested later through a protected review process.

What this first step does not request
  • No passport or identity-document upload
  • No full medical-report upload
  • No bank statement or payment details
  • No promise of funding or treatment
Private first-stage application. Do not upload medical, identity or financial documents here.
01 Applicant details
02 Patient overview
03 Assistance requested

This first-stage form is stored privately in the SCCM WordPress administration area. Notification emails contain only limited contact information and an internal review link.

Potential Support Areas

Designed around barriers that can prevent a patient from moving forward.

Support type and limits are assessed case by case within programme criteria and available funds.

01

Clinical review

Support for essential records review or specialist case assessment.

02

Diagnostic access

Selected investigations needed to clarify a clinical pathway.

03

Care coordination

Practical navigation for complex or international patient journeys.

04

Travel-related access

Limited assistance where distance creates a documented barrier.

05

Rehabilitation

Eligible supportive care connected to a defined recovery plan.

06

Continuity of care

Selected follow-up needs that preserve a responsible care pathway.

Fairness By Design

Clinical need first. Financial review separately.

The access pathway protects medical integrity: financial circumstances do not determine whether a treatment is clinically appropriate.

Clinical suitability review

A doctor-led review considers diagnosis, history, current status, records, objectives and relevant risks.

  • Reviewed independently from financial eligibility
  • No automatic qualification based on condition alone
  • No guarantee of treatment, support or outcome

Access and financial review

A separate authorised process assesses documented barriers, available resources and programme capacity.

  • Consistent criteria and documented decisions
  • Privacy-respecting information requests
  • Conflict-of-interest and approval controls

Access Pathway

Clear stages, without false promises.

1

Application

Patient or authorised caregiver submits the first-stage request.

2

Records

Minimum medical information is requested securely when needed.

3

Clinical review

Suitability is assessed independently.

4

Access review

Financial and practical barriers are evaluated.

5

Decision

Authorised reviewers document the outcome.

6

Coordination

Approved support is arranged with clear limits.

7

Reporting

Programme activity is recorded without public identities.

Privacy & Dignity

Support should never require a patient to surrender their dignity.

The programme collects only information needed for clinical and access decisions, limits who can review it, and avoids identifiable patient stories without explicit consent.

  • Minimum necessary information
  • Authorised review and documented decisions
  • No public beneficiary names by default
  • Medical and financial documents kept out of ordinary email
Private clinical consultation supporting an international patient care pathway

Programme Accountability

Support is documented, reviewed and reported responsibly.

Public reporting uses verified aggregate figures and does not expose patient identities.

AccountingInternal ledger

Qualifying revenue and programme allocation are reconciled internally.

EligibilitySeparate review

Clinical suitability and access decisions follow different review tracks.

ApplicationsPrivate records

First-stage requests are stored in a restricted WordPress administration workflow.

Patient Access FAQs

What patients should know

Will patients pay an extra 2%?

No compulsory patient surcharge is added. The allocation is funded by SCCM from qualifying treatment revenue.

Can I apply for assistance?

Yes. Use the first-stage form on this page. It collects limited contact, care-need and access-barrier information. Detailed documents are requested later only when needed.

Does financial eligibility guarantee treatment?

No. Clinical suitability is assessed separately, and financial support cannot make an unsuitable treatment appropriate.

Who reviews an application?

Applications are stored privately for authorised SCCM reviewers, with clinical and access decisions kept separate.

Care With Clarity

Apply for access support or begin with clinical review.

Patients may request programme assistance and can separately submit medical information for doctor-led Clinical Intelligence Review.

Visual clinical pathway

See how this fits into a doctor-led review.

Use this page as part of a structured decision journey: clarify the patient goal, prepare records, compare options responsibly and move into Clinical Intelligence Review when ready.

01Records
02Diagnostics
03Clinical Review
04Protocol Planning
05Follow-up
Generic online informationDoctor-led reviewStem Cells Center pathway
Starting pointBroad claims and scattered adviceDiagnosis, history, risks and available reportsA structured case pathway before treatment discussion
Decision qualityOften incomplete or one-size-fits-allReviewed against patient context and safetyConnected to diagnostics, suitability and follow-up
Best next actionKeep searchingPrepare records for reviewStart Clinical Intelligence Review
Patient goalBiological signalsTreatment optionsMonitoring plan
Start Clinical Review